Striking the right balance
Ding is researching how far data processing can be brought back into the device itself. A chip or hard drive has significantly less storage and processing capacity than the cloud, which means making compromises, Ding notes. “On the one hand, Edge AI can lead to energy savings and reduced risks in terms of safety and privacy. However, it also requires sacrificing quality and performance. Thus, it’s a matter of research in finding the right balance.”
One of the risks that arises when “compressing” AI models onto a chip, for example, is the presence of biases in data processing. Ding explains, “AI developers often assume a middle-aged, Western, white man as the user, as research shows. This can result in biases in ‘compressed’ models/algorithms. For example, a self-driving car using such algorithms might not recognize individuals as objects under certain conditions, such as when it’s the dark, which is highly dangerous. It’s essential to ensure greater inclusivity in Edge AI.”
Design guidelines for Edge AI
Ding incorporates improvements for Edge AI, such as inclusivity, into a series of guidelines he calls “design patterns for Edge AI.” The goal is to make companies and developers more aware of biases, fairness, and privacy issues and how to handle them carefully. He collaborates with the German institute Fraunhofer FOKUS, one of the leading players in Europe for guidelines on open communication systems and artificial intelligence.
Bridging the gap between the cloud and IoT
Despite the functionality Edge AI can take over from the cloud, Ding believes it’s a misconception to think it will ultimately render the cloud obsolete. “Edge AI should be seen as a way to seamlessly connect the cloud and the smart devices and systems we use in our daily lives, often referred to as the Internet of Things (IoT). It acts as a bridge. Edge AI can provide solutions to problems we encounter with the cloud and that current IoT devices cannot fully address.”